Bob Worsley - "Everywhere" On YouTube

Bob Worsley has a new YouTube video out titled Bob Worsley - "Everywhere" and I have to ask the question, "What is it suppose to tell us?" Watch the video and then I will give you my thoughts.



Now I ask again. What is Bob Worsley trying to tell us in this video? That he is everywhere? So what. Where cares if he is down by the river, or in the middle of the desert or in the car wash. He still isn't telling Mesa voters what his plans to do down at the legislature, how he would balance the budget, protect Mesa voters from the crimes and death committed by illegals.

I want to know his understanding to the constitution, states rights, gun control, education, taxes and a whole lot of other issues. I could care less about him being everywhere. I've been to everyplace he has and so what, so has Russell Pearce.

Little giggles and song may sell items on airplanes, on websites and shopping malls but it doesn't get legislation done.

One other thing, who cares if the Phoenix Chambers of Commerce supports you, that is Phoenix not Mesa.

Get real Bob Worsley, talk about the issues not that you have been everywhere!

Bob Worsley Fearing That He Will Look Dumber Than He Is, Refuses To Debate Russell Pearce.

Spread the Word!Candidate Bob Worsley has decided it is not in his best interest to debate his opponent,
Russell Pearce, at the Az. Red Mountain Tea Party!

For the last two months I have offered Bob Worsley the opportunity to debate Russell Pearce at the largest conservative organization in his district, the Arizona Red Mountain Tea Party. Mr. Pearce accepted the invitation without hesitation.

It was not only an opportunity for Mr. Worsley to display and argue his differences but it was a request from the very constituents he will serve if elected to the State Senate. We want to hear from the man who desires to represent us.

Bob Worsley doesn't get it. America is going back to it's roots when voters demanded to hear from those who want to serve them. You see, based on our constitution it is "We the People" or the constituents who are the employer or boss, and not the politician.

Worsley is living in the past when America voted for candidates they didn't know or have time to get to know. That's why our country is in deep trouble. We use to vote every two years and then pray for that politicians were honest. That strategy didn't work and now we are doing our best to change it. Worsley wants people to vote for him even though he won't dare to debate his opponent and argue his positions. That doesn't sound like a State Senator to me.

Bob Worsley says he is a businessman and all indications are that he is successful. If that is the case he surely understands the process of hiring someone and the guidelines for doing so. Potential employees have to go
through an application and interview process. I'm sure Mr. Worsley would never hire anyone who hadn't gone through an entire interview process. As the employer for America, we the people ask no less of him. If Mr. Worsley wants to be hired to represent district 25, he must go through the interview process. He has a serious responsibility to the voters to let them get to know him.

I don't know about you, but I can't vote for someone who is afraid to debate his opponent. The Arizona Red Mountain Tea Party is tough but fair. We held an excellent debate between Matt Salmon and Kirk Adams. It was an amazing success because people were able to see both of them on stage together, debating the issues in front of their constituents. Many people thanked us afterward for organizing the debate for them.

That's how politics were built in America. We cannot rely on television, facebook, e-mail, twitter or you-tube to determine who we will vote for. There is nothing better than a face to face with those who you are interviewing to do a very important job for you. We can't afford to get it wrong any longer. Voting every two years just because of good looks or name recognition has to end.

Unless Mr. Worsley accepts our invitation to a debate with Mr. Pearce at the Arizona Red Mountain Tea Party, I can't vote for him and neither should you.

I ask you to respectfully encourage Bob Worsley to debate Russell Pearce at
the Red Mountain Tea Party by emailing him at bob@nzlegacy.com

R. Hatch

Does Kirk Adams Still Feel This Way About Russell Pearce?

As the attacks against Russell Pearce continue to increase from the likes of Beth Coons (daughter of Ross Farnsworth Sr., Owner Farnsworth Wholesale Company), Tyler Montague (son of Dea Montague attorney & Senior Operation consultant at Bank of America free checking illegals), Liana Clarkson (teach at Mountain View High School), Jerry Lewis (administrator at Sequia Charter Schools) , Chad Snow (immigration attorney & workers rights), Randy Parraz (fail senate candidate for congress & founder of Citizen for Better Arizona), Caroline Cooper and the left, who are all supporting Bob Worsley, including Kirk Adams and Congressman Jeff Flake.

Here is what Kirk Adams had to say back in 2008 when Russell was under attack. I wonder if Kirk Adams stills feels the same today? 

  

Subject: AZ Republic Article

 The Arizona Republic (Phoenix)

August 15, 2008 Friday
Final Chaser Edition

Vicious attacks on Pearce unfair

SECTION: MESA REPUBLIC 11; Pg. 26

LENGTH: 120 words

As a member of the Arizona House of Representatives, it has been my opportunity to observe and work with Rep. Russell Pearce. During my service in the Legislature I have never observed any language or conduct that even closely approximates the vicious attacks recently levied against him.

The outlandish and offensive attacks are perhaps the low point in the continuing slide toward the politics of personal destruction. As an elected official and a voter I wish to condemn the attacks in the strongest possible terms. We must no longer sit by and allow our political discourse to descend to the depths of something worthy of The Jerry Springer Show.

The voters of Mesa, and of Arizona, deserve better.
-- Rep. Kirk Adams, Mesa

Local Conservative Blogger Rachel Alexander Targeted Telling The Truth

I’ve turned the lights back on here at MichelleMalkin.com after “going dark” to help raise awareness about attacks on blogger free speech. Every phone call, e-mail, tweet, and letter you wrote yesterday to elected officials, state and federal government attorneys, and media outlets about SWAT-tings/convicted bomber and lying vexatious litigant Brett Kimberlin/his funders/his online cabal has made a difference. I am told there are now up to 83 congressional representatives who have signed their names to a letter – demanding “thorough examination at every level” of these terroristic crimes and threats – that will be sent to Attorney General Eric Holder on Monday. And I can tell you there’s much more in the works. At every level.

While we continue to speak out and work in front of and behind the scenes to support the bloggers targeted by Kimberlin, I want to call your attention to how speech-squelching progressives have targeted another conservative activist/blogger who needs your attention and help.

Rachel Alexander is a Townhall.com columnist, RightWingNews.com contributor, attorney, and veteran blogger atIntellectualConservative.com. In 2009, she was named RightOnline’s activist of the year for being a “force multiplier” through her training sessions to get citizens online. She founded her own personal bankruptcy law firm, served in the Arizona Attorney General’s office, and worked in the Maricopa County (Ariz.) Attorney’s Office as a Deputy County Attorney.

In April, the Arizona State Bar suspended Alexander’s law license for six months and one day (the order is here). The order became effective May 10. Less than a week later, she was granted a stay on the suspension as she pursues an appeal. But she’s been hit by another bar complaint as progressive opponents work to destroy her reputation and career.

Why did this happen to the dedicated, outspoken, and unapologetically conservative young lawyer? Her nightmare has all the makings of a partisan political vendetta and witch hunt.

Rachel’s boss at the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office was Andrew Thomas, a staunch law-and-order advocate who tried to clean up corruption in his ranks. Thomas also represented tough-on-illegal immigration Sheriff Joe Arpaio. In gunning for Thomas, the liberal State Bar is trying to claim underling Alexander as collateral damage. Her actual role in Thomas’s attempt to prosecute corruption was minor. Her direct supervisor Peter Spaw, who played a much larger role, has not been targeted by the Bar.

RightWingNews.com founder/veteran blogger John Hawkins, who stepped up to defend his colleague, first recounted the saga last fall:

Thomas ran for re-election in 2008 on a platform of stamping out public corruption with Sheriff Joe Arpaio. Together they decided to take on powerful politicians who had gotten away with corrupt acts for years. Don Stapley, the Chairman of the County Supervisors, raised thousands of dollars to run for president of the National Association of Counties, even though he did not have an opponent. He then spent that money on personal luxury items. Stapley allegedly spent $6000 of these funds at Bang and Olufsen electronics, along with $1300 for hair implants, $400 for candleholders and $10,000 for furniture for his home. He also spent these funds, solicited as campaign money, to buy tickets to Broadway plays and movie theatres. He bought flowers, paid the grocery store and department stores, paid for massages – and paid for family trips to Sundance, to Utah to ski, a trip for his son and friends to Florida and a three-week vacation in Hawaii for his entire family at a beach house costing approximately $11,000.

Thomas brought charges against Stapley and a jury indicted him. Stapley was also indicted for failing to disclose his real estate dealings on financial statements. His business partner, Conley Wolfswinkel, is a convicted felon. Thomas also brought charges against Supervisor Mary Rose Wilcox. She was indicted for voting on giving money to Chicanos por la Causa while failing to disclose she had a sweetheart loan deal from them. Wilcox, who drives a 2006 Corvette, gave herself prime real estate territory at Phoenix’s Sky Harbor Airport through the “minority-owned business” affirmative action program.

What happened to those indictments? They were all dismissed. Most of the prosecutions were conveniently transferred to now retired judges – Judge Kenneth Fields and Judge Gary Donahoe, who threw them all out. Donahoe was subsequently forced to resign in disgrace in June of this year. Realizing he could not get anywhere against the corruption in Superior Court, Thomas and Sheriff Arpaio filed a racketeering lawsuit against the supervisors, judges and their legal counsel. The supervisors refused to authorize any outside counsel to assist Thomas with it. Vastly understaffed, Thomas decided to turn the investigation over to the Department of Justice and withdrew the suit.

… Blogging while conservative is not a crime. Fighting against illegal immigration and corruption is not a crime. However, misusing the justice system for purely political purposes is absolutely despicable and the more sunlight that shines in on this issue in Arizona, the more the cockroaches who are persecuting conservatives will start to scatter.

(FYI: In a detail reminiscent of Brett Kimberlin target Aaron Walker’s legal nightmare in Maryland, it was a group of retired judges who were responsible for getting the corruption charges filed by Thomas against the supervisors dismissed. Useful tools, those retired judges, eh?)

Ever since the corruption case was dropped, the Arizona State Bar has waged a selective prosecution war against Thomas, Alexander, and another former Thomas employee, ex-deputy county attorney Lisa Aubuchon. The latest? Aggrieved county supervisors refuse to fund Alexander’s appeal, so she has been forced to file a notice of claim against Maricopa County for $67,000 to cover the legal fees of her fight against the law-license suspension. (The notice of claim is here.)

The free speech implications are alarming. Alexander was served with interrogatories last summer demanding to know everything she has ever blogged or written online between 2005-2010 on any topic, whether anonymously or signed, including comments.

I have uploaded the document and you can read it right here (click here)

I quote from Interrogatory Number 4:

“Please name any and all aliases that you have used in posting, publishing, or sharing any of your opinions on the Internet, including those ins blog entries, during the relevant time period.”

Fishing expedition, anyone?

Renowned libertarian lawyer Clint Bolick (who happened to be a critic of Thomas and Arpaio) has stepped up to serve as a mentor to Alexander as she appeals her case. Another Thomas critic concluded that the targeting of Alexander “is both selective and overreaching.”

Absurdly, one of the blog posts she was admonished over was one she didn’t even write – the John Hawkins post cited above! Arizona blogger Barbara Espinosa exposed the witch hunt:
If that’s not a gross infringement upon her First Amendment right I don’t know what is. Nothing ever happened to the Bar for this gross overreach, and the media never reported it. During the trial, the Bar prosecutors attacked Rachel for posting an article on her website written by a prominent conservative columnist defending her, John Hawkins of Townhall and Rightwingnews.

The toll Rachel has taken as a result of this witchhunt against her has been brutal. Rachel has been told by numerous people that they will not hire her services because of all this, and her bankruptcy business is suffering. An IP address from Maricopa County government was involved with hacking her website last June, getting it banned from Google for months and permanently banned from Google News. Her website traffic went from 4000 unique visitors per day down to 1000 as a result. She developed a stalker during the Bar trial whose harassment about the trial became so threatening she had to get a restraining order against him.
Arizona blogger David Roney added:
Alexander is being charged, despite a long, unblemished record at MCAO [Maricopa County Attorney's Office], solely for her role working on the RICO case. What was her role? She worked under her supervisor Pete Spaw’s direction. [Spaw] was an experienced RICO attorney who, according to my sources, started the drafts of the pleadings, finalized the drafts of the pleadings with Andrew Thomas, and developed the key theories in them. He exclusively dealt with opposing counsel, and filed all of the pleadings electronically. Alexander’s role consisted of mostly research for the pleadings, and taking direction from Spaw, nothing further. Yet Spaw was not charged by the Bar, only Alexander.

The real issue here is [an] allegation that Alexander sought to burden and embarrass county supervisors. The allegation is nothing short of hilarious on its face…. The supervisors, with a few exceptions, have done a pretty good job of bringing poor press and embarrassment upon themselves. And they did so all without the help of Alexander…

…digging deeper, the charges against Alexander reek of fulfilling a vendetta for running a political blog, and a conservative one at that. Most of their unfettered discontent comes from blog posts they attribute to Alexander, that she in fact did not write. The Arizona State Bar is anything but a right-leaning organization, and it appears to seek to censor a person with whom they disagree, while leaving others untouched.

Blogger Selwyn Duke came to the same conclusion:

So this is a story of corruption. There is the garden variety, in which those who walk tall and stand against evil are targeted by those who wish to continue enriching themselves. But then there is the kind that is another hallmark of despotic regimes: political persecution. It is a phenomenon of fascism, whereby those who toe your line get benefits, and those who don’t get intimidated into silence or, when they’re too stout-hearted, destroyed. By any means necessary.

Then, once big business and all other prominent people and entities are marching in lock-step, you have complete control over civilization. This is Chicago – and, it appears, Maricopa – politics. And we allow it to stand at our own peril.

Rachel could use any financial support you are able to help provide. You can donate through her Paypal at az4vlad@hotmail.com. Spread the word about her case.

As stalwart conservative blogger/activist Elizabeth Crum summed up Rachel’s plight: “What has happened to her can happen to anyone who publicly stands up and blogs with conservative principles.”

Make no mistake: This is just another nasty battle in the Left’s long war to marginalize, demonize, and criminalize conservative dissent. The selective protection of free speech is unconscionable. The freedom to blog is under assault on so many fronts. It has to stop.

The first step in fighting back: Sunlight. Lots of it.

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle’s e-mail list ~

http://michellemalkin.com/2012/06/09/bloggers-under-fire-arizona-conservative-lawyeractivist-targeted-by-left-wing-arizona-state-bar/

The Tactics Used By The Left To Fight Conservatism

The Blaze put up a piece called Meet Soros-Funded Domestic Terrorist Brett Kimberlin Whoe "Job" Is Terrorizing Bloggers Into Silence and it got me think.

You see Brett C. Kimberlin, who this is about got 50 years in prison for a bombing spree in which he only served 17 years. During that time he got a law degree and when he got out he created a movement called Justice Through Music and Velvet Revolution, both left wing organization fund by the like of George Soros. Mr. Kimberlin through the use of these organization and his left wing friends and the courts have gone after conservative blogger and individual with a vengeance. They used lawsuits, intimidation, false accusations, whisper campaigns and innuendos to shut people up. You've got to read it to believe it.

After reading the story I couldn't help but compare it to what Randy Parraz, Citizens For A Better Arizona, Tyler Montague, Beth Coons, Lianna Clarkson and the Jerry Lewis supports did during the recall election against anybody and everybody who supported Russell Pearce. If you recall, they went after Olivia Cortez with lawsuits, her bishop and Michael Wright tried to intimidate her by visiting her in her home. Stephen Lemons of the Phoenix New Times wrote slanderous stories about, Bruce Ross, Russell Pearce and other supporters. Randy Parraz & Carolyn Cooper used the daughter of one of Russell Pearce's supporters in an attempt to intimidate and humiliate into submission (which apparently work).

You see this is the only way the left can win. They don't have legs to stand on and their arguments don't hold water. To see these tactics in action all you have to do is look around at the campaign tactics being used against conservative candidates and their supporters.

 Randy Parraz, Citizens For A Better Arizona and Stephen Lemons of the Phoenix New Times are even at it again, in the Bob Worsley and Russell Pearce. Except this time they are trying not to make it so obvious.

Who Really Is The One Note Piano Player

Recently Bob Worsley put out up a YouTube video suggesting that Senator Russell Pearce was a one note musician with inference that Bob Worsley was a masterful musician who could bring all the notes together and make music we will all find appealing.

I've got to say pretty well done. So lets take a closer look at the masterful musician Bob Worsley and the music he is playing . Lets take a look at the truth of Bob's music notes. Musician Worsley says that he will he will play the notes of Economy, Family, Lower Taxes, Jobs, Cut Spending, Education

Bob Worsley on the Economy - Bob has to do a poll to telling him that people are concerned about their jobs but yet Bob laid off over 40% of workforce at the Showlow alternative fuels Bio-Mass Electrical Plant

Bob Worsley on Family -  Bob defend Phoenix New Time in sex crime against kids, yet touts his family values.

Bob Worsley on Lower Taxes - . Bob and wife Christe donate to Democrat Harry Reid, take tax dollars then file bankruptcy on Show Low Bio Mass plant. That's called sticking it to tax payers.

Bob Worsley on Jobs - . Claims he  has created over a thousand jobs, but where is the questions. His companies laid off 42% of employees at business in Show Low area. Now has a land and mineral holding company that doesn't employ anybody. At Skymall there wasn't a 1,000 employees, it was a catalog company that took orders.

Bob Worsley on Spending Cuts -  Supports those who will raise taxes, Raul Gravala, Harry Reid, Support Primary Property Tax on Mesa Residents.


Bob Worsley on Education - Associate with Saul Alinsky's IAF and the MEA.

Russell Pearce on the other hand is a proven Champion on all these issues and has a track record to prove it. So who is the masterful musician after all?

Action Russell Pearce vs Talking Bob Worsley

In the race for Arizona's Legislative District 25 you have two very different choices to choose from. Action Russell Pearce and Talking Silver Tongue Alternative Fuels Bob Worsley.

On the one hand you have Russell Pearce a man of action and services. A man who tells you what he is going to do and then does it. Promises Made Promises Kept. He took on immigration and he told us if the federal government wasn't going to do the job of protecting American worker and families he was, even if that meant taking the fight all the way to Washington DC. Guess what? Russell has done just that and now the immigration issue is before the Supreme Court of the land who will make the final ruling. Instead of me telling you what Russell has done I will let Russell tell you in his own words.

Now we get to Talking Silver Tongue Alternative Fuels Bob Worsley. Now this man may have good intentions and have his heart in the right place to be preach over a Spanish congregation but is he the man to lead us through the next few years. He says we need change but what kind of change. 3 years ago people voted for "Hope and Change" and look where that has gotten us. High unemployment, massive foreclosures, and an unstable economy. Bob Worsley was a part of that hope and change with his and his wife's donation to Harry Reid the Senate President in Washington DC.

He touts Skymall but Skymall was a failure before it was a success and almost cost Bob and others millions of dollars before it had a couple of successful year during which time Bob got out. Then there is the Bio-Mass plant in Snowflake which has never been successful and for which Bob and his wife got millions of dollars in tax credits, sound vaguely familiar to other "so call green companies" under the Obama administration.

Hey, but Bob's a nice guy and has created a 1,000 jobs, that is before he let people go. But for a man who wants to elevate Arizona and Mesa he sure isn't telling us how he is going to do it. Or maybe he does have a plan the Saul Alinsky's Industrial Areas Foundation plan or maybe the Randy Parraz's plan.